Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 05/2006
My Photo

« Notes from the 2006 Peak Antifreeze Indy 300 Presented by Mr. Clean at Chicagoland Speedway | Main | pressdog Launches Decal-based Effort to Jump-Start Reunification Efforts »

September 16, 2006

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jahuti Rhys

Tongue-in-cheek and all that, but as usual, the truth is illustrated.This problem has been in F1 for years: There is no substitute for cubic money. When Penske has a private wind tunnel and routinely buys particular expensive parts by the case so they can test and cherry-pick the best of the lot while the teams like D&R struggle to afford lunch, something has to be done to limit expenditures.Clearly the defacto type-acceptance of the cars hasn't helped just as limits on displacement and engine type in F1 haven't limited horsepower.The only thing that might help is a "no modifications of any sort outside of seup are allowed" rule.Personally, I think that they should allow any sort of engine, including a blown NASCAR V8 and concentrate on safety rules. That eliminates expensive tweaks as a way to the winner's circle and again puts a premium on driver performance.

Anonymous

Do not make the Greatest Spectacle in Racing the Greatest Spec Race in Racing just so more than 3 teams can win a race throughout the season. There is a long tradition of mid-packers and back markers. The Indianapolis 500 has never been about just driver talent, it has been about innovation, creativity, teamwork and driver talent.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Get the Indy Inside Scoop!


pressdog® Merchandise


Subscribe

  • Get notified by e-mail when
    the blog is updated.

    Name:
    Email:
    Subscribe 

    Your e-mail address won't be shared/sold/rented/loaned etc.