Something this amazing is causing me to break my 14-day IndyCar hiatus.
The evidence is pretty clear to me, based on Marshall Pruett's two-part article on Randy Bernard's ouster, that the majority of IndyCar still does not get how important fans are. And, frankly, we've about had enough.
But the part that really communicates that vast sections of IndyCar don't understand that fans ultimately -- directly or indirectly -- provide all the revenue for the series, came in Part 2, when Pruett recounts a driver's reaction to fans' outrage that Bernard had been forced out. Pruett writes:
As one driver told me, a public uproar over losing a CEO, rather than an equal or greater uproar to solve IndyCar’s problems or promote its drivers, has been troubling.
“Can you imagine NASCAR fans getting pissed because [NASCAR president] Mike Helton was fired? They wouldn't give a damn as long as Dale Jr., Jimmie Johnson and the rest are out racing on Sunday.
“Maybe the drivers need Randy's PR machine because I don't remember this much backlash when even a top IndyCar driver lost his job.”
Pruett was clearly talking to a person who does not understand what fans want, or what drives fans to care. What's needed to get fans to care is not a "PR machine." Let's examine that premise. Randy's PR Machine. What was that? What was this Big PR Effort that Randy Bernard allegedly mounted, that drivers really need, according to this person?
Here it is. Brace for it. I went to college, so don't beat yourself up that you couldn't figure it out for yourself .... Randy interacted with fans. BOOM. The Big PR Machine is REVEALED. All Randy did, was ask fans what they think. That, all by itself, was something incredibly new in IndyCar. Invite fan input? LUNACY. Bernard gave out his email address and .. this is critical ... respond to fan emails. He had conversations with fans.Of course he did not agree with fans all the time. Of course he did not just blindly do what fans wanted. Nobody expected him to. People just like to know their ideas are being considered. No rational fan expects their every idea to be adopted. We all know that sometimes we're wrong or have dumb ideas. All we care about is that someone 1) wants our input and 2) gives us consideration and 3) replies. That's creating a dialog, and it is not rocket science.
That was the bulk of his Big PR Machine. CLEARLY that is too much for teams and drivers to do without the aid of a team of 19 PR reps. I mean, how can drivers be expected to interact with fans on Twitter for say, a savagely long 45 minutes a day? How can drivers be expected to respond to some fan emails now and then or actively update their fan Facebook pages? How can drivers be expected to carve 30 minutes out of their jam-packed race weekends to do a Q&A in the fan zone or just mingle? It's INSANITY to suggest those things because drivers and team owners are clearly non-stop busy around the clock 24/7 with no time for side issues like building relationships with fans.
You'll get no argument from me that Randy Bernard had flaws aplenty and made big mistakes, and handled some things poorly, and had missteps throughout his career as IndyCar CEO, and was rough around the edges. This was far from a perfect man. And yet, he was very popular with hard-core fans. Why?
Simply because he cared what the fans thought. That's the secret sauce. The Big PR Machine. He also made himself available to the media at every race. Every single race that I am aware of Bernard made an informal appearance in the media center and took whatever questions the media had. That drove stories, which fans read, and they said "at least this guy is telling us what's going on."
The fact that all it took for Bernard to become very popular with very invested fans was to talk to them via social media and email, and make himself available for 30 minutes in the media center at every race, and give interviews to whoever asked for them tells you how attention starved IndyCar fans have become.
But the fact that building these simple relationships with fans is what makes someone popular with said fans is lost on the quoted driver -- and it seams most (but by no means all) of IndyCar is the most telling evidence that IndyCar just ... does not ... get it. Free tip: Make finding and keeping the kind of fans you want your first priority, and everyone makes ass-loads of cash. And it doesn't take a Big PR Machine. A small one will do fine.
IndyCar should not try to appeal to everyone, just as all businesses don't chase everyone as a customer. Some customers can actually cost you money. A huge toilet paper wholesaler doesn't want my consumer business. They want to sell to Target. Likewise IndyCar does not want to try to appeal to every consumer. They can't appeal to fans who want bashing and wrecks and festivals of flying cars. So don't chase those customers. Chase the ones who like road and street racing and non-contact oval racing. Figure out what customer you want, figure out what those customers want from you, give it to them, build relationships with them, make lots of money. This seriously Business 101. And the most infuriating thing for me is that I've been saying this -- to the level I get accused of repeating myself and whining -- for literally years.
And every time I run through this fans-first strategy, I think "I have to sound like a preachy prick here. Surely they know this stuff." So I'm done urging IndyCar to put fans first. God knows I'm well on record.
If I were IndyCar (that includes league, owners, drivers, boards of directors) I'd move quickly to get beyond platitudes posted on IndyCar.com and left to sit there for four months with no action. Fans (who share my attitude) are sick of this crap, frankly, and we want you to SHOW us the love (you figure out how to do that), not just tell us you love us, because we are pissed off and tired of being taken for granted. There are lots of competitors out there that want our money, from NASCAR to F1 to Knoxville Raceway and other sports on TV and movies at the cinemaplex. We can't spend our money in two places or watch two things on TV at once, so convince us we should spend and watch with you, or we're walking.
Run the fact that your audience is leaving en masse by Firestone, IZOD, Target, etc. etc. etc. and see what they say. Then get back to us about "core constituencies."
Very well said, and as a business consultant if I were advising the owners of the series...I would suggest they find a buyer and quickly....since based upon what has been written and said by long time fans...the current management has little if any chance of regaining approval from them.
Posted by: Ted Wolfram | November 03, 2012 at 09:38 AM
Is this uproar larger than the uproar to save Ed Carpenter's ride?
To be devils advocate for a moment, at the core of IMS is a hell-actual family of related people who may or may not like each other from day to day. This is true about the France family as well, but the reason I bring this up is, I wonder how much of the "none of your business" posturing is just because these people think of certain information as actually none of the public's business? Would racing of all stripes be better if they became completely corporate, no longer family run things?
Just thoughts, none of the above is even my opinion.
Posted by: Chunter16 | November 03, 2012 at 09:58 AM
Awesome article. Wish the right people would listen.
Posted by: bonnie yost | November 03, 2012 at 10:17 AM
I couldn' agree with your comments more. I'm not completely gone yet because there are a few drivers that I like to follow but the board changed me from an aggressive advocate to a passive observer. I spent a lot of time going to races last year and was left with them impression that except for Randy Bernard, the "paddock" consider the series their country club and the fans were just an unwanted aggravation.
Posted by: Lynn Kromminga | November 03, 2012 at 10:43 AM
Someone needs to wallpaper this article all over 16th and Georgetown. You are no longer Bill. You are Saint Pressdog, Patron Saint of Racing Fans.
Posted by: Jeremy from Harrisburg | November 03, 2012 at 10:55 AM
It's more than Randy sought and considered fan input; he took ACTION on ideas. Finally broke the chassis iceberg and paved the way for the DW12. Implemented double-file restarts. Got rid of the Turn 3 restarts at Indy. Restored 11 rows of 3 on the front straight. Scooted Barnhart out of the officiating booth and from the competition rulesmaking. Brought back a Triple Crown. Brought back Pocono. On and on. He ACTED.
Posted by: Maury | November 03, 2012 at 11:01 AM
I can't imagine why anyone with a tiny shred of sense would unsubscribe from your "New Dog Blog Entry" notices unless they're the clueless drivers and team owners and management employees of the IMS board & the Hulman-George Co & Family.
I usually argee with you 100% and have no reason to change now.
I'm still debating with myself how much or how closely I'll follow INDYCAR next season, although I suspect once the season starts I just won't be able to help myself and will find my butt glued to the LazyBoy in front of flat screen or if possible, glued to a seat in the grandstands.
Something I would like to add is about how under RB the activities for the fan were vastly increased.
At the final race in 2009 at Homestead all that IndyCar had for the fan was the old walk through display trailer, the merchandise tent, and a small stage were not much happened.
There was a TweeUp being organized by Pat C who was a PR rep for Vision Racing (I think). To their credit IndyCar decided to participate in that tweetup and it was a fun event.
Things went pretty much the same for 2010 at least at the 3 or 4 races I went to that year.
This year at the season finale at Fontana there was a true "Fan Village" with tents and displays with a good number of sponsers and car manufacturers including Chevy, Honda, Madza, Verizon, NovaLog, plus l from most of the drivers at one time or another at the various displays. Truly a 1000% improvement from 3 years earlier.
I hope next year's fan experience is as good or even. better!
Posted by: Ttomkat | November 03, 2012 at 11:02 AM
"Except for Randy Bernard, the paddock consider the series their country club and the fans were just an unwanted aggravation."
Everything Bill has said or I have said or any number of other people have said can be summed up with this one sentence.
The Board was blindsided by the fan response to RB's "dismissal" purely because the 1% in INDYCAR can't figure out why fans would care so much about what happens in the higher levels of the sport.
If fan investment comes as such a shock to them, none of the BS that comes out of that boardroom should come as a shock to us.
Posted by: Steph | November 03, 2012 at 11:49 AM
Randy had earned the fans trust. He did it exactly the way that Bill described in his blog. What the IMS board should take from the backlash is that fans of Indycar have no trust in their ability to do the right thing for the sport we are so passionate about. Based on history, I see absolutely no reason to trust them to take the sport forward.
Posted by: Tornado | November 03, 2012 at 12:25 PM
Ironically Bernard ultimately got the axe because he did listen to--and try to please--the fans. Not the owners. Not the drivers. Fans.
And that--Mr. Nameless Driver--is why Bernard was a bigger story to the fans than any driver.
Posted by: redcar | November 03, 2012 at 01:21 PM
Thanks for the great read Bill. Randy was an agent of change..and doing a great job in my opinion. I think the Hulman's and many of the owners have let time get away from them and don't understand that the key to success is to cast "fresh eyes" upon the processes of any business. It's a shame.
Posted by: chiefswon | November 03, 2012 at 02:13 PM
Bill,
You hit the nail on the head with your article.
I was a loyal IndyCar fan from the mid-1970's until last Sunday evening. After the announcement, I felt that I'd once again become another "forgotten fan."
I'm of the opinion that the only way I'll get anyone from IndyCar to understand how alieniated I now feel is to stop supporting them with my hard-earned money.
I promptly got online and cancelled our hotel rooms for next years races at Long Beach, Indy and Fontana.
Called the Speedway ticket office last Monday morning and asked if I could receive credit for my recent renewal for our 2013 Brickyard 400 tickets. We've had the same tickets since the first race in 1994, so the decision while difficult, was necessary as I can no longer justify supporting the Hulman-George family.
The customer service person at the Speedway ticket office asked why I wanted a refund. When I explained my postion regarding Randy's sudden "departure" she replied "we've received numerous calls this morning regarding this issue and a lot of people are not happy."
She went on to say that while the tickets were "non-refundable" the Speedway management was asking for contact information from the callers and "might" call me back.
I didn't expect a return call from Speedway management and as of this morning, haven't received one.
No surprise there, eh?
Needless to say, I won't be renewing those tickets again.
The 2012 IndyCar season was one of the most competitive and exciting seasons in recent memory. My two friends and I left Fontana on that warm (ok, hotter than Hell) Saturday night excited about the racing we'd witnessed, the crowning of the first American born IndyCar champion in several years and the prospect of an even more exciting 2013 season. I contacted both friends after Sunday's announcement and they agreed with me: No more IndyCar races for them.
Unfortunately IndyCar, I've filed for "divorce." What grounds? Well, there's "Fan Abandonment" "Psychological Abuse" and "Communication Breakdown."
Guess it's time to attend some Grand-AM, ALMS and NHRA events.
Posted by: CorvetteKid | November 03, 2012 at 02:16 PM
The sad thing is the driver that made this comment has a ride and Pippa Mann who is the exact opposite can't get a ride. I can see now why see doesn't. The owner don't want or need fan interaction nor do they want someone who seeks it. It is pretty much give us your money and GTFO!
Posted by: MrAnalog | November 03, 2012 at 02:26 PM
SO MUCH truth here! What little interaction I've had with drivers at races has been awesome and it surely didn't seem to take much effort on the drivers' parts. Why can't they understand something so simple?
Posted by: Sandy | November 03, 2012 at 04:53 PM
Not to go off script with the "you're so right" brigade screaming into a vacuum, but you at no point address whether or not he was actually good at his job beyond the fans. This article comes across as a pile of sanctimonious bullshit. not trolling, just being honest.
China lost with no money (and they could've put up front cash, or a fee even if they backed out into the contract), check
The people who actually put their lives on the line not listened to, check
the people who spend a hell of a lot more money on this series (owners) not being listened to, check
The board losing a shitastic amount of money, check
The dude clearly only did one part of his job well, and sucked at the rest.\
I'm sorry, I agree, fans come first, but NOT SOLELY.
Most of you will obviously disagree so flame away boys.
Posted by: TheAmericanMutt | November 03, 2012 at 06:32 PM
After years of dis-illusionment, and frustration, I've come to the realization that Indycar is not a business. It is a private club for a select few. The real disconnection on the ends of the ownership is expecting to make money at this. Clearly they need to accept that losing $ is just the cost of their membership dues to be a part of the club.
Posted by: Tom G. | November 04, 2012 at 09:42 AM
I feel so bad for the car owners. When I imagine how awful it would be to have to live the life of Ganassi or Penske or Andretti, my eyes fill with tears of sympathy. Clearly, they are the true victims here.
Posted by: redcar | November 04, 2012 at 10:03 AM
I'm gonna have to say that I agree with Mario Andretti in that I think we're all concentrating on the political side of this too much...
The races are what it's all about, and there's been some great racing this year...
I'm still thrilled by seeing Marco trying to get around Tony at Iowa, or RHR on the podium this year...
Posted by: Marty J in Des Moines | November 04, 2012 at 07:57 PM
As Mr Dog has stated, it doesn't take a lot of time to interact enough with fans for them to feel a part of the team/driver/series and that someone is interested in hearing from them.
If you look at F1, NASCAR & V8 Supercars, you can see varying levels of interaction individually but even those who do it the most, it's not large chunks. Some driver's twitter/facebook feeds are 100% PR written while others, it's the driver themself (and others with a combination) - it actually doesn't matter which way. So if the driver says "but I don't have time" then they can just have the person they're already paying to do it.
Posted by: elephino | November 04, 2012 at 10:12 PM
This is what I would say to anyone who wants to learn how a driver can (and should) help the series survive: Seize every opportunity to learn how Pippa Mann relates to fans; read anything written by Pippa Mann, on her fan club site, her blogs, her Facebook page.
Posted by: David Williams | November 05, 2012 at 05:59 PM
Here's Randy Bernard's philosophy on sports business: "We need to make sure our fans experience great competition and entertainment at a great value at each and every event." Enough said, let's work!
Posted by: NaBUru38 | November 07, 2012 at 07:16 AM
MrAnalog and David, I had the exact same thought on Pippa as I was reading this. She's gone so far as to give a recent shout out on her blog allowing the fans to post their wishes/complaints for IndyCar in the hopes of making some of it heard FOR THE FANS.
What a breath of fresh air!
Posted by: cartracer20 | November 08, 2012 at 12:37 PM